Stephen King: If you can't read, you get the Army and go to Iraq

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 68GTO
    The Coach Z
    • Sep 2003
    • 15772

    #31
    Originally posted by titanium View Post
    The prisoners and ex cons the US military has opened itself up to are true patriots and servants of our LORD JESUS CHRIST SAVIOR OF THE UNITED STATES AND FOUNDATION OF OUR NATION. They are smarter than any stupid idiot Stephen King, Shawshank Redemption was just a story about some prison rape and gay relationships. May he burn in hell for his tragic stories and stupidity


    ~God Bless~

    Typical. When you can't argue the point, try to argue something else and distract.
    Captain Obvious reporting for duty.
    • Bullet point mafia
    There = a place
    Their = belonging to someone, possessive
    They're = contraction of they + are

    Comment

    • 68GTO
      The Coach Z
      • Sep 2003
      • 15772

      #32
      Originally posted by Zinc View Post
      Nice try.
      Fail to rebut the point again. Epic fail.
      Captain Obvious reporting for duty.
      • Bullet point mafia
      There = a place
      Their = belonging to someone, possessive
      They're = contraction of they + are

      Comment

      • Zinc
        yipyipyipyipyip
        • Feb 2003
        • 17324

        #33
        Originally posted by 68GTO View Post
        Fail to rebut the point again. Epic fail.
        Ok. I've already passed over your gibberish in this thread. Saying that his career isn't enough to prove how intelligent he is, is idiotic in every sense of the word.
        Pure as the driven snow.

        Comment

        • LES
          Doing more with Les!
          • Apr 2006
          • 33157

          #34
          Originally posted by Zinc View Post
          Ok. I've already passed over your gibberish in this thread. Saying that his career isn't enough to prove how intelligent he is, is idiotic in every sense of the word.
          Actually to base someones intelligence on thier level of success is not real bright either. I know ALOT of successful ignorant people. Should we start talking about your beloved pro athletes?
          It is a damn poor mind indeed which can't think of at least two ways to spell any word.
          Andrew Jackson

          Comment

          • SFC
            I know drama
            • Jun 2004
            • 24976

            #35
            Originally posted by LES View Post
            Actually to base someones intelligence on thier level of success is not real bright either. I know ALOT of successful ignorant people.
            Might want to modify that to "successful, stupid people". There's plenty of extremely intelligent AND ignorant people out there.
            You stay classy Chet Beireis
            Originally posted by Paul Revere
            I can't wait for that ****** to take all the credit


            PITBULLS KILL KIDS!!!
            ROTTWEILERS EAT BABIES!!
            Celtic Mafia
            6.2L Mafia
            319whp of fury

            Anticipation is the bane of my existence.

            Comment

            • Zinc
              yipyipyipyipyip
              • Feb 2003
              • 17324

              #36
              Originally posted by LES View Post
              Actually to base someones intelligence on thier level of success is not real bright either. I know ALOT of successful ignorant people. Should we start talking about your beloved pro athletes?
              I knew someone was going to bring that up. Being a successful literary mind pretty much requires you to be quite intelligent. Athletics, not so much.
              Pure as the driven snow.

              Comment

              • LES
                Doing more with Les!
                • Apr 2006
                • 33157

                #37
                Originally posted by Zinc View Post
                I knew someone was going to bring that up. Being a successful literary mind pretty much requires you to be quite intelligent. Athletics, not so much.
                Facts to support this please?
                It is a damn poor mind indeed which can't think of at least two ways to spell any word.
                Andrew Jackson

                Comment

                • LES
                  Doing more with Les!
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 33157

                  #38
                  Originally posted by SFC View Post
                  Might want to modify that to "successful, stupid people". There's plenty of extremely intelligent AND ignorant people out there.
                  HAHAHA I originally had stupid and changed it. I wasnt sure wich way I wanted to lead the thread. Cant get anything by you!
                  It is a damn poor mind indeed which can't think of at least two ways to spell any word.
                  Andrew Jackson

                  Comment

                  • Zinc
                    yipyipyipyipyip
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 17324

                    #39
                    Originally posted by LES View Post
                    Facts to support this please?
                    Facts to support what? Are you saying that you can write award winning novel series, tv series/movies, and films without being a borderline genius?
                    Pure as the driven snow.

                    Comment

                    • LES
                      Doing more with Les!
                      • Apr 2006
                      • 33157

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Zinc View Post
                      Facts to support what? Are you saying that you can write award winning novel series, tv series/movies, and films without being a borderline genius?
                      The burden is not on me to prove that you can. The burden is on you to prove what you are saying is true.
                      It is a damn poor mind indeed which can't think of at least two ways to spell any word.
                      Andrew Jackson

                      Comment

                      • GoldenPlump
                        TCS Homer
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 6863

                        #41
                        Well Zinc there's a couple different forms of intelligence.

                        The guy may be able to write some pretty great books, but his understanding of human behavior looks to be lacking.

                        I like to think that I have a pretty good understanding of human nature, but there's no way in hell that I could write like he does.

                        I can also walk upright, which that alone makes me superior to Stephen King.

                        Comment

                        • Zinc
                          yipyipyipyipyip
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 17324

                          #42
                          Originally posted by LES View Post
                          The burden is not on me to prove that you can. The burden is on you to prove what you are saying is true.
                          I'm pretty sure I've already disproved the point that Stephen King isn't stupid. What else was there to prove again?
                          Pure as the driven snow.

                          Comment

                          • Zinc
                            yipyipyipyipyip
                            • Feb 2003
                            • 17324

                            #43
                            Originally posted by GoldenPlump View Post
                            Well Zinc there's a couple different forms of intelligence.

                            The guy may be able to write some pretty great books, but his understanding of human behavior looks to be lacking.
                            Really? Because last time I checked, he has sold 350+ MILLION books that almost solely deal with human behavior, and how he can twist it.
                            Pure as the driven snow.

                            Comment

                            • titanium
                              Hi friend
                              • Feb 2006
                              • 4639

                              #44
                              Originally posted by 68GTO View Post
                              Typical. When you can't argue the point, try to argue something else and distract.
                              Whats to distract? I'm just spreading the message of our Lord while supporting the original post? Would you like to take that freedom from me? Maybe you should go back to lusting after jail bait and assaulting woman (crime/sin and makes you no different from a terrorist).

                              I will pray that you find the path of God one day.

                              ~o~O~o~~GodBless~o~O~o~

                              Comment

                              • Max Power
                                PierreGustaveToutantBeaur egard
                                • Apr 2004
                                • 13086

                                #45
                                Originally posted by SFC View Post
                                Seriously... I can't believe I'm the only one here who finds it funny that the media is clipping the beginning of the sound bite, and not even giving you the context of the Q&A.
                                Can't argue with that, can only wonder why the term "liberal media" hasn't been tossed around by the usual suspects, per usual. I guess, like everything, it is situational.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                😂
                                🥰
                                😘
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😞
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎