Camaro vs Mustang vs Challenger

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fosters
    Typical white person
    • Sep 2006
    • 16014

    Camaro vs Mustang vs Challenger



    and the article:

    Originally posted by punch
    SFC is a bag of stupid.
    Capitalization is the difference between helping your uncle Jack off a horse & helping your uncle jack off a horse.
  • 5.0stang85
    Hater's be hatin'
    • Oct 2007
    • 7065

    #2
    thats not a fair test at all.. you cant put a 426hp camaro against a 345hp challenger and a GT mustang

    you would think they would opt for the SRT8 chall and the GT500 as a fair race.?
    71 Dodge Demon Green/Blk big turbo slant 6 in progress
    83 GT Red/Blk HCI 306/ 3550/ 4.30 8.8
    93 LX Reef Blue/ Grey stock bolts on's/ T5/ 3.55 8.8

    Cooter's Coatings
    Hudson WI
    1-612-867-0725- Don "Harvey" Harvey http://cooterscoating.com/

    Comment

    • Notch
      Trunkback Moostang
      • May 2005
      • 23574

      #3
      No neon, no care.

      Comment

      • Fosters
        Typical white person
        • Sep 2006
        • 16014

        #4
        Originally posted by 87mustangguy306 View Post
        thats not a fair test at all.. you cant put a 426hp camaro against a 345hp challenger and a GT mustang

        you would think they would opt for the SRT8 chall and the GT500 as a fair race.?
        they went more by price... this way they were all around 30k. The mustang being the cheapest at 28k, w/ the other 2 hovering around 31k; whereas going after the srt8 and the gt500, would have meant the camaro is the only one at a 10 grand disadvantage...

        But, I know what you're thinking of... compare top of the line to top of the line... And I tend to agree

        Now if only Ford would pull it's head out of it's ass and put a 350+hp 5.4 in there... if they can get 315 out of the 4.6, they should be able to squeeze another 50hp out of 0.8L in a performance car application... Would have been a better way to add 35 lbs to the car than the stupid extra sound deadning they put in the 2010...
        Originally posted by punch
        SFC is a bag of stupid.
        Capitalization is the difference between helping your uncle Jack off a horse & helping your uncle jack off a horse.

        Comment

        • Mullet Tuner
          TCS Homer
          • Apr 2004
          • 15906

          #5
          camerowned
          Originally posted by Gerald
          black z is a TCS fgt he should sell that z and go buy a blown 87 gt so he could be a true TCS fgt

          Comment

          • Scorpner
            Some posts are Ironic
            • Jun 2006
            • 8476

            #6
            It's great to see the big three go at it again. Just wish I had the money to buy one right now. Although I'm not sure which one I'd choose.


            Originally posted by 87mustangguy306 View Post
            thats not a fair test at all.. you cant put a 426hp camaro against a 345hp challenger and a GT mustang
            Sorry, the only other V8's available are the LS7 (505 hp) and LS9 (638 hp).
            The only other option would be the six popper @ 300hp.

            We're not playing with Legos here.
            -Sorry.

            Comment

            • mnstang
              Bookending TCS
              • Oct 2002
              • 33500

              #7
              yeah!!!! sound deadening sucks!!! so do power windows and ac too! what a bunch of sellouts, i want to hear every damn noise possible and even noises i didn't know existed. then remove the radio for further weight savings since you also won't be able to hear it too!
              i'm a hardcore mustang fan!

              Comment

              • Fosters
                Typical white person
                • Sep 2006
                • 16014

                #8
                Originally posted by mnstang View Post
                yeah!!!! sound deadening sucks!!! so do power windows and ac too! what a bunch of sellouts, i want to hear every damn noise possible and even noises i didn't know existed. then remove the radio for further weight savings since you also won't be able to hear it too!
                i'm a hardcore mustang fan!
                Puhleez. I'm sure the 05-09 lost many customers due to insufficient sound deadning... many more than it would gain otherwise by simply wiping the floor w/ the camaro...

                Originally posted by Scorpner View Post
                It's great to see the big three go at it again. Just wish I had the money to buy one right now. Although I'm not sure which one I'd choose.




                Sorry, the only other V8's available are the LS7 (505 hp) and LS9 (638 hp).
                The only other option would be the six popper @ 300hp.

                We're not playing with Legos here.
                -Sorry.
                Except neither of those is offered in the camaro.
                Explore Chevrolet's lineup of game-changing performance vehicles including iconic American sports cars, powerful SUVs, off-road trucks, and innovative EVs.
                Originally posted by punch
                SFC is a bag of stupid.
                Capitalization is the difference between helping your uncle Jack off a horse & helping your uncle jack off a horse.

                Comment

                • OffShore
                  yes it floats
                  • Nov 2005
                  • 9995

                  #9
                  there all base model v8 cars too, Chevy is bad ass for that price and 426 hp....should have hit the 427 hp mark though. So much for the mighty hemi and why would they not have put the new hemi w 390 hp and vvt
                  11.0 w 550 whp > 11.0 w 1100 whp VW

                  Comment

                  • Got Diesel?
                    Perfect Combo- Work and Play!
                    • Sep 2005
                    • 1205

                    #10
                    has anyone actually seen a new camaro on the road......I haven't?
                    89 Mustang 351ci
                    470 rwhp 520 tq
                    10.94@ 126

                    Comment

                    • 95.0mark
                      MN is falling apart
                      • Jan 2005
                      • 21173

                      #11
                      As far as looks. dodge>ford>chevy imo.

                      why is the camaros 0-60 so low? it seemed to hook well, so that sems really weak. .2 faster then the stang and has over 100 more hp? hmmmm. whats the gearing on the 2?

                      Comment

                      • OffShore
                        yes it floats
                        • Nov 2005
                        • 9995

                        #12
                        Originally posted by 95.0mark View Post
                        As far as looks. dodge>ford>chevy imo.

                        why is the camaros 0-60 so low? it seemed to hook well, so that sems really weak. .2 faster then the stang and has over 100 more hp? hmmmm. whats the gearing on the 2?
                        almost 5 mph in the 1/4 is the # to watch. Stang prob has less hp loss and better launch w lower hp and less weight plus a live axle over IRS
                        11.0 w 550 whp > 11.0 w 1100 whp VW

                        Comment

                        • TitaniumGT
                          www.twolaneracing.com
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 11042

                          #13
                          I actually like the new camaro.
                          1993 Titanium Cobra (1 of never)
                          AFR 165s, Cobra intake, FTI cam. NX N20
                          Best ET 11.2 @ 123 on the 100 shot.
                          446RWHP and 585RWT
                          1998 Atlantic Blue Cobra convertible(1 of 1 built)
                          Vortech S-trim
                          346rwhp and 314rwtrq

                          Comment

                          • OffShore
                            yes it floats
                            • Nov 2005
                            • 9995

                            #14
                            Originally posted by TitaniumGT View Post
                            I actually like the new camaro.
                            All I had to do is sit in it and Im sold, its as close to the cocpit feel as my c5 as I have got so far....and it has 4 seats
                            11.0 w 550 whp > 11.0 w 1100 whp VW

                            Comment

                            • shock13
                              TCS Homer
                              • Oct 2005
                              • 2771

                              #15
                              The Mustang has better handling because the platform has been around for 5 yrs, although I think the Camaro has too, at least in magazines.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X
                              😀
                              😂
                              🥰
                              😘
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😞
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎