Well here comes the attack on guns...
Collapse
X
-
No need to stir the pot here. Even though these are high profile cases that indeed suck, the number of horrors compared to the number of legally registered carriers is minimal. There ain't no way the gubmint is taking legally held firearms.
Comment
-
-
Despite eight rampages that have claimed 57 lives since March 10, "it hasn't sparked any national goal to deal with this epidemic. In fact, it's going the other way," said Scott Vogel of the Freedom States Alliance, a gun control activist group.You stay classy Chet Beireis
Originally posted by Paul RevereI can't wait for that ****** to take all the credit
PITBULLS KILL KIDS!!!
ROTTWEILERS EAT BABIES!!
Celtic Mafia
6.2LMafia
319whp of fury
Anticipation is the bane of my existence.
Comment
-
-
How about this one:
"To Chamberlain, the answer to gun violence lies not in stricter regulations, but in answering the question, "Why are we so tolerant of having guns in this country? The answer to that is historical. We've had guns for a very long time."
WTF?!!?"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves."
- Ronald Reagan
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Nifty View PostHow about this one:
"To Chamberlain, the answer to gun violence lies not in stricter regulations, but in answering the question, "Why are we so tolerant of having guns in this country? The answer to that is historical. We've had guns for a very long time."
WTF?!!?You stay classy Chet Beireis
Originally posted by Paul RevereI can't wait for that ****** to take all the credit
PITBULLS KILL KIDS!!!
ROTTWEILERS EAT BABIES!!
Celtic Mafia
6.2LMafia
319whp of fury
Anticipation is the bane of my existence.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by svonasek View PostIn it were his gun permit, photos of him smiling while hoisting shiny, big handguns, and his driver's license.
I like the quality reporting on this oneDear Government, eventually the people with money will tell you to fuck off, and stop paying for those that don't work
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SFC View PostWithout them we'd still be paying homage the queen?"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves."
- Ronald Reagan
Comment
-
-
-
What the fuck are they going to do? I mean honestly.
none of these guys had criminal records of any kind, or other issues. How the fuck are you supposed to know who is going snap and who isn't when they have no prior of anything? The answer is simple, they can't. Enforcing stricter rules acomplishes nothing. What are you going to enforce stricter?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfpyB6AC9ak
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HerrKooled View PostWhat the fuck are they going to do? I mean honestly.
none of these guys had criminal records of any kind, or other issues. How the fuck are you supposed to know who is going snap and who isn't when they have no prior of anything? The answer is simple, they can't. Enforcing stricter rules acomplishes nothing. What are you going to enforce stricter?Not at the table, Carlos.
Comment
-
-
I've heard of another time when people were unhappy with their taxes, and fed up with a distant government that made rules regardless of the consequences to the people that had to obey them. That government got twitchy about those fed up citizens and sent some troops to disarm them. This is what happened: Battles of Lexington and Concord
Comment
-
Comment