I just heard on Jason Lewis that Norm Coleman is leading by 6 votes. Now they're going through the "voter intent" stuff. Uh, I'm sorry, if you're too retarded to clearly mark who you are voting for on a ballet...your vote shouldn't count. Why is this even an issue? Is there some group out there lobbying for the rights of 'tards that can't fill out a ballet correctly? God damn.
Norm Coleman By 6 Votes
Collapse
X
-
What happened to the guy that lashed out against the rampant social darwinism on TCS and claims to vehemently stand behind the constitution? Should there be aptitude tests for gun ownership too? Government involvement in family planning?Originally posted by Stallion View PostI just heard on Jason Lewis that Norm Coleman is leading by 6 votes. Now they're going through the "voter intent" stuff. Uh, I'm sorry, if you're too retarded to clearly mark who you are voting for on a ballet...your vote shouldn't count. Why is this even an issue? Is there some group out there lobbying for the rights of 'tards that can't fill out a ballet correctly? God damn.
Grumble grumble slippery slope grumble grumble...
Comment
-
-
I agree with you to an extent. If it can be perceived that the vote was for a democrat it should be counted. If it's for a republican it should be thrown out.Originally posted by 95.0mark View PostI agree, if you are to dumb to check a fuggin box, your vote should not count. wow what a country!1998 Buick Lesabre Custom
Comment
-
-
If they tie, do we have to re-vote or can they just duel to the deeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatttttttthhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh h!!!! Bwwwwwahahaaaaaaa.....- Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves. Reagan



_____________________________________________Check out the worlds lightest, smallest 9" Ford housing at WWW.RACECRAFT.COM
Comment
- Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves. Reagan
-
There's nothing unconstitutional about throwing out a ballot that is undecipherable. I don't understand your correlation between this and social Darwinism.Originally posted by fuzzy moonunit View PostWhat happened to the guy that lashed out against the rampant social darwinism on TCS and claims to vehemently stand behind the constitution? Should there be aptitude tests for gun ownership too? Government involvement in family planning?
Grumble grumble slippery slope grumble grumble...
Comment
-



Comment