Pro's and Con's

[5SpeedFox]

Ok, So i'm new to this site but i'm kinda in a spot and need a little insite. I have been looking to get a mustang and i have 2-3 options. One is a fox body stang, 5.0 auto, bout 100k on it. The other is a 94' 5.0 5-speed with 130k on it. Can anyone please give me any Pro's/Con's in general about these two different style stangs? Anything, I like Both and any insite would be AWESOME, thanks alot guys. -Brian

[Iroc-Z]

The foxes are lighter then the 94-95's

[5SpeedFox]

What else? and how much lighter?

[Outrun]

What body style do you like?

[StangerJon]

get the 5 speed one.

it'd be one less thing you would complain about the fox for.

[5SpeedFox]

I like The fox body mustangs Body style, but i like the 94-98 interior and don't dislike the body style. I might go with the 5-speed. A couple people on here are sayin it's really easy to convert an auto to 5-speed on a foxbody stang. Anyone on here done it? what all do you have to do and how "easy" is it really?

[KickAssFlash]

5 speed for sure. The chassis also pwns the fox's, as its alot more stiff. As previously stated, however, it is a couple hundred pounds heavier. Otherwise, the 94-95 is almost exactly like the fox.

[Macs Stang]

Depending on the year of fox body it will have forged pistons, while the '93-'95's had hyper pistons. '87-'88 had speed density, '89-'93 used mass air. '90-'93 had the air bag steering wheel. '91-'93 went with the larger front fenders to accomodate the larger 16" pony wheels.