Never Seen This Before

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Never Seen This Before

    Maybe Im behind but I never hear of this until there was one in the paper.

    Anyone seen one out on the road yet?
  • 84FiveO
    Cleaner of burned rubber...
    • Dec 2002
    • 731

    #2
    Saw them at the Autoshow a year or two back.

    I had heard they were going to do a limited production run of these.

    Should be interesting....but at 42 G's I'll let some other sucka buy one and just admire his
    1984 Red Stang GT 58K, mint

    2004 Silver Mercury Marauder, 13.5 psi Eaton S/C

    448rwhp, 452rwt

    Comment

    • CaptCrunch
      Damn GM Guy!
      • Nov 2002
      • 1932

      #3
      They are supposedly out... I don't really dig them and especially not for 40G's. Car companies really need to pull their heads outta their asses with their new car pricing.
      -1968 Chevelle

      Comment

      • 93SVT
        CLEVON
        • Dec 2002
        • 7226

        #4
        Iv seen 3 or 4 of them, not sure it one was seen 3 times or what but iv seen a red one 3 diffrent times and also the blue/purple color, this was about a month ago, havent seen one sisne the snow really started flying, kinda fugly if you ask me but to each his own

        Comment

        • Zephyrefi
          Formerly K-ougar
          • Dec 2002
          • 3169

          #5
          There's no reason why it should cost that much. They used mostly off-the-shelf parts including Trailblazer chassis and motor. I s'pose just for exclusivity. If the SSR wasn't such a weird configuration, there's no reason why that shouldn't be a high volume model. I've actually thought that would be a good way to bring back a classic muscle car name, base it on a compact truck frame a la the Chevy Bel Air show car of a few years ago. Or manufacturers could even base the cars they race in Nascar on their trucks. Hey, with a solid body-on-frame design with solid rear axle, they could even race cars that are far closer to their production counterparts than those stupid things they race now. Win on sunday sell on monday would come back in full form. Ranger-based Torino GT with 5.4L power vs. Colorado-based Chevelle SS with the 5.3 anyone?

          Comment


          • #6
            I remember seeing it on some car tv show...I think Motor Trend. I remember that when they were testing it that its actually very slow. 0-60 in 7.6 seconds and 1/4 mile in 15.9 at 90mph and that is all with 3.73 gears. Its kinda sad that Chevy even made it. It would have made more sense if they had kept the f-body and redesigned it to fit the market better. Well whatever, Im a Ford guy anyways.

            Comment

            • Guest's Avatar

              #7
              I've seen two of them so far and I don't like the roof line. They are pretty heavy, that's why the poor performance numbers.

              Comment

              • CAMSS30
                .
                • Oct 2002
                • 36850

                #8
                Originally posted by 84FiveO
                .

                Should be interesting....but at 42 G's I'll let some other sucka buy one and just admire his


                I will admit they are overpriced but not as bad as the T-birds were when they came out.
                Buying muscle/sports cars/regular cars/trucks, send me info, I pay cash or credit card if that makes you feel better!

                Comment

                • Sleeper
                  Reasonable volume.
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 14888

                  #9
                  I cant say the SSR is a great looking thing...it isn't practical in any specific way...it has too much of the "oh, theres one of those" factor, which fades pretty quick...just like the PT Cruiser...

                  To me, the 05 Mustang is more interesting

                  Comment

                  • Fernanernie
                    Hot slut aficionado
                    • Dec 2003
                    • 50750

                    #10
                    I've seen one about a month or two ago. All that I have to say is, good thing that it's got an LS-1, because it's just fugly looking
                    Dear Government, eventually the people with money will tell you to fuck off, and stop paying for those that don't work

                    Comment

                    • Doodler
                      Billy Zane stunt double
                      • Jul 2003
                      • 1750

                      #11
                      Originally posted by 99SSleeper
                      I cant say the SSR is a great looking thing...it isn't practical in any specific way...it has too much of the "oh, theres one of those" factor, which fades pretty quick...just like the PT Cruiser...


                      That's the exact same thing I was thinking when I was reading this tread.


                      www.3Deuce-speedshop.com

                      http://www.facebook.com/pages/3Deuce...op/62368646794

                      Comment

                      • Sleeper
                        Reasonable volume.
                        • Nov 2003
                        • 14888

                        #12
                        Originally posted by 2003Mach1
                        Ranger-based Torino GT with 5.4L power vs. Colorado-based Chevelle SS with the 5.3 anyone?
                        But the Chevelle would have the 5.7 since it would be on the GTO platform

                        Comment

                        • Glass Joe
                          Graphics Manager
                          • Oct 2002
                          • 2152

                          #13
                          Very Ugly if you ask me.

                          Comment

                          • Zephyrefi
                            Formerly K-ougar
                            • Dec 2002
                            • 3169

                            #14
                            Originally posted by 99SSleeper
                            But the Chevelle would have the 5.7 since it would be on the GTO platform
                            nooooooooooo. it would be based on a truck. i had that idea before all this GTO craziness started. I don't think importing a high volume model from Australia is really practical anyway.

                            Comment

                            • Sleeper
                              Reasonable volume.
                              • Nov 2003
                              • 14888

                              #15
                              Originally posted by 2003Mach1
                              nooooooooooo. it would be based on a truck. i had that idea before all this GTO craziness started. I don't think importing a high volume model from Australia is really practical anyway.
                              No, it isn't practical, but it won't take long for Chevy to put their twist on the GTO....then they'll be made in Mexico which is wayyyy closer

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X
                              😀
                              😂
                              🥰
                              😘
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😞
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎