FED UP - A Texas Bank calls it quits

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • badcobra
    BEAT IT!!!!!!
    • Sep 2004
    • 4409

    FED UP - A Texas Bank calls it quits

    It's literally Atlas Shrugged happening right before our eyes.

    CLIFFS: Crushing federal regulations forcing businesses to simply sell or close shop. Business owners simply giving up rather than deal with Obama's bureaucrats.



    Fed Up: A Texas Bank Is Calling It Quits

    Main Street Bank lends most of its money to small businesses and is earning decent profits. But the Kingwood, Texas, bank is about to get out of the banking business.

    In an extreme example of the frustration felt by many bankers as regulators toughen their oversight of the nation's financial institutions, Main Street's chairman, Thomas Depping, is expected to announce Wednesday that the 27-year-old bank will surrender its banking charter and sell its four branches to a nearby bank.

    Mr. Depping plans to set up a new lender that will operate beyond the reach of banking regulators—and the deposit-insurance safety net. Backed by the private investment firm of Microsoft Corp. co-founder Paul Allen, the company won't be able to call itself a bank, but it will be able to do business the way Mr. Depping wants.

    "The regulatory environment makes it very difficult to do what we do," says Mr. Depping, who last summer saw his bank hit with an enforcement order from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

    A spokesman for the FDIC declined to comment on Main Street, a unit of closely held MS Financial Inc. Dan Frasier, director of corporate activities for the Texas Department of Banking, confirmed that Main Street is "working on the process of moving out of the state banking system," but declined to provide details.

    Bankers have long complained about their overseers, but it is rare for a bank to basically close its doors aside from an acquisition or failure. Mr. Depping blames the move on a tightening regulatory noose.

    Regulators came under fire in the financial crisis for lax oversight that allowed financial institutions to dole out too much credit to unworthy borrowers. Some bank executives now complain that federal and state agencies have swung to the other extreme, poring over minute details of virtually every loan, including those to small businesses.

    "The No. 1 complaint that we hear from community bankers is that they feel that regulators have gone one step too far and are choking off lending," says Paul Merski, chief economist at the Independent Community Bankers of America, a trade group that represents small banks.

    .Regulators defend their efforts, saying that intensive oversight is needed to prevent banks from taking too much risk and repeating the behavior that got the industry in trouble.

    Mr. Depping has been on a collision course with regulators since 2009, when FDIC examiners began questioning the bank's large concentration of small-business loans. Nearly all of Main Street's $175 million loan portfolio has gone to customers like dentists, owners of fast-food franchises and delivery-truck drivers, who use the loans to purchase equipment. The bank's average loan size is $100,000 to customers who have less than $1 million in annual revenue, Mr. Depping says.

    Mr. Depping says that Main Street's focus on small-business lending has sheltered the bank from much of the devastation that has swept the industry, including 385 bank failures since the start of 2008.

    Main Street had profits of $1 million in the second quarter and wrote off 1.25% of its loans as uncollectible. That is below the industry's charge-off rate of 1.82% in the FDIC's data for the first quarter, the latest available. The bank has earned nearly $11 million in the past year.

    In July 2010, the FDIC slapped Main Street with a 25-page order to boost its capital, strengthen its controls and bring in a new top executive. Regulators also said the bank was putting too many eggs in one basket. Mr. Depping says regulators wanted the bank to shrink its small-business lending to about 25% of the total loan portfolio, down from about 90%.

    Mr. Depping says he explained to regulators that Main Street has focused on small-business lending since he bought the bank in 2004 with a group of investors. He says the bank makes credit decisions based on a combination of the borrower's personal-credit and business-credit histories, among other factors.

    "We felt that servicing small business is something the country needs and that we're really good at it. I thought the model was working just fine," Mr. Depping says.

    Main Street also was required to increase its capital cushion and prohibited from substantially expanding its balance sheet.

    FDIC officials told the bank to file financial reports that "accurately reflect the financial condition of the Bank as of the reporting date," particularly regarding the money it set aside to cover loan losses.

    The FDIC also ordered Main Street to shore up its lending guidelines so that loans are "supported by current credit information and collateral documentation, including lien searches and the perfection of security interests; have a defined and stated purpose; and have a predetermined and realistic repayment source and schedule," according to the order.

    Main Street bolstered its capital levels by getting smaller. It sold a business and shrank its loan portfolio, actions that boosted its Tier 1 leverage ratio—a measure of capital as a proportion of assets—to 17.3% at June 30 from 9.5% a year earlier. It also brought in a new president.

    Even so, soon after last July's order, Mr. Depping began exploring a transaction that would include the unusual step of surrendering his banking charter.

    Mr. Depping's new company, called Ascentium Capital, will be backed by Vulcan and a group of investors led by an investment arm of Luther King Capital Management, based in Fort Worth, Texas.

    The new entity won't be regulated and won't be able to offer federal deposit insurance—but doesn't want to attract deposits, Mr. Depping says. The new firm is being capitalized with $75 million of equity and a $250 million financing facility led by UBS. Mr. Depping says he wants to ultimately increase the loan portfolio to $500 million.

    The deal also calls for Green Bank, a unit of Houston-based Green Bancorp Inc., to acquire Main Street's four branches. Ascentium will acquire $150 million of Main Street's loans, with the rest going to Green.

    Mr. Depping hopes the deal will close by October after receiving regulatory approvals and completing Main Street Bank's unwinding.

    "It's a lot easier to become a bank than to get rid of your bank charter," he says.
  • badcobra
    BEAT IT!!!!!!
    • Sep 2004
    • 4409

    #2
    Another one....A Coal Mine owner tells federal regulators he's quitting.

    If it had been a scene in “Atlas Shrugged,” the guy would have disappeared into the secrecy of Colorado with a shadowy figure who we would later learn to be John Galt. In real life, the…


    “Nearly every day without fail…men stream to these [mining] operations looking for work in Walker County. They can’t pay their mortgage. They can’t pay their car note. They can’t feed their families. They don’t have health insurance. And as I stand here today, I just…you know…what’s the use? I got a permit to open up an underground coal mine that would employ probably 125 people. They’d be paid wages from $50,000 to $150,000 a year. We would consume probably $50 million to $60 million in consumables a year, putting more men to work. And my only idea today is to go home. What’s the use? I see these guys—I see them with tears in their eyes—looking for work. And if there’s so much opposition to these guys making a living, I feel like there’s no need in me putting out the effort to provide work for them. So…basically what I’ve decided is not to open the mine. I’m just quitting. Thank you.”

    Comment

    • NOTNSS
      x
      • Mar 2004
      • 42731

      #3
      Stupid Fed...err FDIC

      Comment

      • crzy88lx
        I Rock Catholic Girls
        • May 2005
        • 3561

        #4
        Obama is working hard on creating jobs. He has earned all his new grey hair....

        Total happiness is being stroked and blown at the same time

        https://www.facebook.com/IBuiltMine

        Comment

        • 40oz
          TCS Regular
          • Apr 2006
          • 182

          #5
          Who cares, really? Some guy wants to get out of the banking industry because it isn't the way he wants to make money? Fine, go to.

          He wasn't driven out of business, he made a business decision. Why is anyone supposed to care?

          And last I checked, the only thing the Republican in Congress have wanted to do for the last few years is block everything that Obama has tried to do. So blaming this somehow on the President is ludicrous. If there is anyone to blame for the current state of the economy it is the spend-happy, do-nothing Republicans.

          If you are going to piss and whine about political parties, at least put the blame where it belongs. We had a Republican President who thought it was a good idea to initiate an ambitious military campaign half a world away, then cut taxes to "pay for it."

          Reality check: cutting taxes simply cuts revenues.. Which is why we are here today facing huge deficits and massive debt. And now you have the same Republicans who got us into this mess screaming any time someone suggests actually raising revenue to pay the bills. And placing the blame on Democrats who Republicans accuse of trying to actually pay the country's bills, as if that is a bad thing.

          Comment

          • Fosters
            Typical white person
            • Sep 2006
            • 16014

            #6
            I can't wait to move out of this dumbass state.
            Originally posted by punch
            SFC is a bag of stupid.
            Capitalization is the difference between helping your uncle Jack off a horse & helping your uncle jack off a horse.

            Comment

            • crzy88lx
              I Rock Catholic Girls
              • May 2005
              • 3561

              #7
              Originally posted by 40oz View Post
              Reality check: cutting taxes simply cuts revenues.. Which is why we are here today facing huge deficits and massive debt. And now you have the same Republicans who got us into this mess screaming any time someone suggests actually raising revenue to pay the bills. And placing the blame on Democrats who Republicans accuse of trying to actually pay the country's bills, as if that is a bad thing.
              Reality Check: Government spending more than they take in caused huge deficits. less taxes on business owners allows them to invest more money in to their busniess and hire more people. more people working = more tax payers = higher tax revenue.

              the U.S. has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world, if not the highest. therefore more busniesses either have manufacturing done in other countries or simply moved out of this country all together. less tax paying companies = less taxes paid.

              also, they arent the same republicans in office. remember who took control of the house and the senate before Bush was even out of office? Democrats. who spent more money than the republicans ever could hope to spend. Quit listening to the same democrat Bullshit and pay attention to what is really going on.
              Total happiness is being stroked and blown at the same time

              https://www.facebook.com/IBuiltMine

              Comment

              • Max Power
                PierreGustaveToutantBeaur egard
                • Apr 2004
                • 13086

                #8
                I keep hearing how corporations are taxed here more than anywhere in the world, yet corporations are about the only thing thriving in this economy. I keep hearing how cutting taxes to corporations creates jobs, yet all those jobs seem to be in China. I keep hearing how lowering the tax rate keeps people employed, yet when we cut taxes last the unemployment rate was 4%, now it is 9.5%. I keep hearing how wealth trickles down, but even the founder of that theory disavows it.

                I may be all mixed up, but if we are going to govern by theory instead of science, I would like to see some evidence that all this theory actually works.

                Comment

                • 40oz
                  TCS Regular
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 182

                  #9
                  Reality check: Cutting taxes to the point the gov't cannot take as much revenue as it spends causes deficits.

                  If lower taxes on business owners actuallty had any economic benefit, why are we where we are today? Bush cut taxes back in 2001 and 2003. How long are we supposed to wait for these magical business owners to invest their tax savings?

                  The US has some of the lowest tax rates in the world, corporate or otherwise. Tax rates vary from state to state, so it isn't reasonable to make any staetment such as yours without specifying what combined federal + state tax rate you are referring to.

                  Remember that the Democrats in Congress while Bush was President spent most of that time working with the President, not merely blocking any kind of legislation that didn't come from their own party. Bush inherited the largest budget surplus this nation has ever seen, and pissed it all away.

                  Stop listening to Republican bullshit and pay attention to what is really going on. If tax cuts really generated more jobs and revenue for the federal government, when the hell is that supposed to happen? It's been ten years since that line got the first round of tax cuts passed, and we still haven't seen this theoretical benefit. If there was any validity to that argument, it would have proved itself by now.

                  The obvious shortcomings of cutting revenues while insisting on massive expenditures supporting an ambitious foreign military campaign have become obvious to anyone that doesn't have their head up their ass.

                  Comment

                  • crzy88lx
                    I Rock Catholic Girls
                    • May 2005
                    • 3561

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Max Power View Post
                    I keep hearing how corporations are taxed here more than anywhere in the world, yet corporations are about the only thing thriving in this economy. I keep hearing how cutting taxes to corporations creates jobs, yet all those jobs seem to be in China. I keep hearing how lowering the tax rate keeps people employed, yet when we cut taxes last the unemployment rate was 4%, now it is 9.5%. I keep hearing how wealth trickles down, but even the founder of that theory disavows it.

                    I may be all mixed up, but if we are going to govern by theory instead of science, I would like to see some evidence that all this theory actually works.
                    I work for a Corporation. they arent thriving at all. in fact they have laid people off 3 years straight now and for three years we havent had profit sharing because there is no profits.... the last time this happened to our company was the great depression...

                    i work for a window company even though the Goverment issued tax credits to people who buy new windows, it didnt seem to help us out in the least bit.

                    The government picks and chooses what companies to "tax credit" too. only the companies that want to comply with their agenda...
                    Total happiness is being stroked and blown at the same time

                    https://www.facebook.com/IBuiltMine

                    Comment

                    • N8Dogg98
                      Nasty
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 1885

                      #11
                      Originally posted by 40oz View Post
                      Reality check: Cutting taxes to the point the gov't cannot take as much revenue as it spends causes deficits.

                      If lower taxes on business owners actuallty had any economic benefit, why are we where we are today? Bush cut taxes back in 2001 and 2003. How long are we supposed to wait for these magical business owners to invest their tax savings?

                      The US has some of the lowest tax rates in the world, corporate or otherwise. Tax rates vary from state to state, so it isn't reasonable to make any staetment such as yours without specifying what combined federal + state tax rate you are referring to.

                      Remember that the Democrats in Congress while Bush was President spent most of that time working with the President, not merely blocking any kind of legislation that didn't come from their own party. Bush inherited the largest budget surplus this nation has ever seen, and pissed it all away.

                      Stop listening to Republican bullshit and pay attention to what is really going on. If tax cuts really generated more jobs and revenue for the federal government, when the hell is that supposed to happen? It's been ten years since that line got the first round of tax cuts passed, and we still haven't seen this theoretical benefit. If there was any validity to that argument, it would have proved itself by now.

                      The obvious shortcomings of cutting revenues while insisting on massive expenditures supporting an ambitious foreign military campaign have become obvious to anyone that doesn't have their head up their ass.
                      Then what is the answer?

                      Obama and the democrats tried to "stimulate" the economy by spending money and it did nothing. Are you suggesting that our economy will get better if the republicans lose the house in 2012, and the democrats again control the white house and congress? Do you believe raising taxes would help the economy?

                      Comment

                      • crzy88lx
                        I Rock Catholic Girls
                        • May 2005
                        • 3561

                        #12
                        Originally posted by 40oz View Post
                        Reality check: Cutting taxes to the point the gov't cannot take as much revenue as it spends causes deficits.

                        If lower taxes on business owners actuallty had any economic benefit, why are we where we are today? Bush cut taxes back in 2001 and 2003. How long are we supposed to wait for these magical business owners to invest their tax savings?

                        The US has some of the lowest tax rates in the world, corporate or otherwise. Tax rates vary from state to state, so it isn't reasonable to make any staetment such as yours without specifying what combined federal + state tax rate you are referring to.

                        Remember that the Democrats in Congress while Bush was President spent most of that time working with the President, not merely blocking any kind of legislation that didn't come from their own party. Bush inherited the largest budget surplus this nation has ever seen, and pissed it all away.

                        Stop listening to Republican bullshit and pay attention to what is really going on. If tax cuts really generated more jobs and revenue for the federal government, when the hell is that supposed to happen? It's been ten years since that line got the first round of tax cuts passed, and we still haven't seen this theoretical benefit. If there was any validity to that argument, it would have proved itself by now.

                        The obvious shortcomings of cutting revenues while insisting on massive expenditures supporting an ambitious foreign military campaign have become obvious to anyone that doesn't have their head up their ass.
                        please explain how taxing more of people's money helps them grow a business? how does taxing more of their money allow people go buy more of the goods/services that they want? your sad view of Economics is nothing short if idiotic.

                        also, if you would look up the worlds corporate income tax rates, you will find us second, just behind japan for the highest rate. figure it out.

                        i an not saying republicans never spent too much money, but when you compare to what they spent while bush was president compared to how the democrats spent in the last 4-5 years im sure you will find the results more than overwhelming. Obama and the current administration took the worst of Bush's policies and expanded way further.
                        Total happiness is being stroked and blown at the same time

                        https://www.facebook.com/IBuiltMine

                        Comment

                        • Fosters
                          Typical white person
                          • Sep 2006
                          • 16014

                          #13
                          Originally posted by 40oz View Post
                          The US has some of the lowest tax rates in the world, corporate or otherwise. Tax rates vary from state to state, so it isn't reasonable to make any staetment such as yours without specifying what combined federal + state tax rate you are referring to.
                          Reality check:



                          Conclusion: You're fucking stupid.



                          Federal = 35%, states 0-12%. that makes it 35-47% tax rates.
                          Originally posted by punch
                          SFC is a bag of stupid.
                          Capitalization is the difference between helping your uncle Jack off a horse & helping your uncle jack off a horse.

                          Comment

                          • Xtort
                            TCS Homer
                            • Dec 2004
                            • 6968

                            #14
                            Last edited by Xtort; 08-11-2011, 05:20 PM. Reason: Back to FB...


                            http://youtu.be/GTQnarzmTOc

                            Comment

                            • SFC
                              I know drama
                              • Jun 2004
                              • 24976

                              #15
                              Originally posted by crzy88lx View Post
                              I work for a Corporation. they arent thriving at all. in fact they have laid people off 3 years straight now and for three years we havent had profit sharing because there is no profits.... the last time this happened to our company was the great depression...

                              i work for a window company even though the Goverment issued tax credits to people who buy new windows, it didnt seem to help us out in the least bit.

                              The government picks and chooses what companies to "tax credit" too. only the companies that want to comply with their agenda...

                              If you work for a company whose profit is directly tied to new construction, it should be in the shitter. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that there are currently more houses on the market than there are people with money to buy them. Cutting corporate taxes isn't going to rectify that situation. You would do far more to tax the wealthy, give money back to the poor people who will then turn around and spend it, than you would to continue giving money to the wealthy who will at best "invest it".

                              Target doesn't create jobs because it's stock went up. Target doesn't create jobs because it's taxes went down. It creates jobs when it sells more goods at its stores. The fact so many people can't grasp such a simple concept amazes me. It doesn't matter what their tax rate is, the amount of people employed is directly tied to the amount of goods they sell, not the amount of money they have in the bank.
                              You stay classy Chet Beireis
                              Originally posted by Paul Revere
                              I can't wait for that ****** to take all the credit


                              PITBULLS KILL KIDS!!!
                              ROTTWEILERS EAT BABIES!!
                              Celtic Mafia
                              6.2L Mafia
                              319whp of fury

                              Anticipation is the bane of my existence.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X
                              😀
                              😂
                              🥰
                              😘
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😞
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎